Land-Water Interactions
Research
Current Projects and
Results
Production and fate
of dissolved
materials on land.
Microbial processing
across the
landscape.
Controls on
biogeochemical
processes and
catchment export.
References
Introduction.
The simple idea of a
hydrological catchment
as a study ecosystem has
provided a clear
framework of
biogeochemical cycling
within and between
ecosystems for several
decades. Yet it
has proved an
extraordinary challenge
to measure the outputs
of energy and
biochemical elements and
relate them back to the
underlying processes
controlling the
structure and function
of the terrestrial
ecosystem. We still
understand little about
the complex dynamics and
rates of production of
dissolved materials on
land, and their delivery
to surface waters.
For example, a review of
42 studies of DOC and
DON concentrations and
fluxes in temperate
forests found that lab
and field studies
differed greatly in
their results, and that
site-specific controls
such as temperature or
C:N ratios were rarely
evident at regional
scales (Michalzik et al.
2001). We do know
that across biomes the
climate and vegetation
influence the production
of materials moving from
land to water, and
precipitation and
hydrology are strong
drivers of material
exports and can govern
the response of
receiving surface
waters. Using our
conceptual model of
these controls (Figure
LW-1), we are asking
research questions about
each of them and
synthesizing our
observations in part by
determining how these
processes scale in space
and time across
landscapes. We
have also begun to
incorporate these
concepts and
measurements into
mathematical models,
necessary for
extrapolations and
predictions of how the
arctic system operates
and how it will respond
to change. The
sections below outline
some background and
highlights of our major
research questions and
results within the
framework of land-water
interactions.
In
summary, the main
conclusions are: (1)
Soil and especially root
production of dissolved
materials that can be
exported to surface
waters is extremely
high, but the net export
is low and thus
processing by microbes
must be substantial;
(2) Microbial
community composition
and activity are
strongly linked, and
there are distinct and
consistent patterns of
microbial processing at
key points in
terrestrial and aquatic
ecosystems across the
landscape; (3)
Interactions between
different ecosystems
along the toposequence
of hillslopes are
critical for
understanding how
process-level knowledge
can be scaled-up to
answer questions on
catchment and regional
biogeochemistry; and
(4) Despite no
evidence of increasing
thaw depth near Toolik
Lake, observed changes
in the geochemistry of
lakes and streams over
time can only be
explained by a melting
of permafrost and thus
systematic changes in
thaw depth in the basin
due to global warming.
(1) Production and
fate of dissolved
materials on land.
Our initial research in land-water interactions for the Arctic LTER focused
on carbon cycling, and
set the stage for
current research
directions. We
found that the C loss
from the entire Kuparuk
Basin via streams and
lakes is around 4 g C m-2
of land surface per
year, with almost one
third of this loss as CO2
and CH4
released from surface
waters directly into the
atmosphere (Figure
LW-2). This
lateral loss of C is
substantial, and prior
to this was unaccounted
for in terrestrial
budgets. Globally,
this movement of gases
to the atmosphere from
lakes and streams is
about 25% of the total
global C flux from land
to the oceans through
rivers.
On
the basis of these
findings we examined in
detail the production
rates of dissolved C in
soils, and applied a
14C tracer to
intact tundra
ecosystems. The
findings were surprising
in that the production
of DOC from plant roots
alone is extremely high,
from 1-4 g C m-2
per day, whereas DOC
export is only 2-3 g C m-2
per year!
Our conclusion is that
microbial processing of
this C must be
substantial, ~2 orders
of magnitude higher than
the net catchment export
(Judd and Kling 2002;
Kling, Nadelhoffer,
Sommerkorn, Rastetter
unpublished).

And
this importance of
microbial processing as
DOM moves from land to
oceans is not restricted
to the Arctic; consider
that in most terrestrial
systems NPP is very
large, 100s of g C m-2
per year, and yet the
NEP is usually near zero
and dissolved export
averages only ~6 g C m-2
y-1 worldwide
(Hope et al. 1994).
Thus the huge difference
in terrestrial C
production and aquatic
export must be due
mainly to microbial
processing in soils.
Given this strong
biogeochemical influence
across landscape scales,
we can ask questions
about the spatial
pattern of microbial
processing – where are
the control points, and
who is responsible.
(2) Microbial
processing across the
landscape.
The influence of
land-water transfers of
nutrients and organic
matter is a dominant
aspect of aquatic
ecology, and microbial
transformations of these
materials underlie
production, respiration,
and atmospheric
gas-exchange in
ecosystems. But
consideration of how
these processes are
linked and interact
across the landscape is
relatively new, and
requires an integration
of concepts in microbial
and landscape ecology.
For example, we must
consider the congruence
of ecotones and spatial
boundaries of ecosystems
with the rates of
microbial activity, as
well as the
biogeographical
diversity of microbes
and the time scales that
microbial populations
adapt physiologically
and by changing
population frequencies.
As described below, we
found several distinct
patterns of microbial
species and processing
rates in terrestrial and
aquatic ecosystems
across the landscape.
In addition to
discovering these
patterns of community
composition and
activity, we tested an
ongoing debate in
ecology that revolves
around how species
composition and
ecosystem function are
related. To address the
mechanistic controls of
this relationship, we
manipulated the
composition of DOM fed
to aquatic bacteria to
determine effects on
both bacterial activity
and community
composition. Sites
along terrestrial to
aquatic flow paths were
chosen to simulate
movement of DOM through
catchments (Figure
LW-3), and DOM was
fed to downslope and
control bacterial
communities. Bacterial
production was measured
and DOM chemistry and
bacterial community
composition (using
denaturing gradient gel
electrophoresis of 16S
rRNA genes) were
characterized following
incubations. Bacterial
production,
DOC-specific bacterial
production, and DOC
consumption were
greatest in mesocosms
fed soil water DOM; soil
water DOM enhanced lake
and stream bacterial
production by 320-670%
relative to lake and
stream controls (Judd et
al. 2006). But the
really novel finding was
that adding upslope DOM
to stream and lake
bacterial communities
resulted in significant
changes in bacterial
community composition
relative to controls.
In these experiments
the bacterial community
composition converged
based on DOM source
regardless of the
initial inoculum (Figure
LW-5). In
other words, when lake
bacteria were fed soil
or stream DOM, the lake
community assemblage
shifted to resemble the
species present in the
soil or the stream
(green and red arrows in
Figure LW-5). Clearly
the soil and stream
bacteria were already
present in the lake in
undetectable numbers,
but when exposed to soil
or stream DOM these
populations had a
metabolic advantage and
grew to replace the
originally-dominate lake
bacteria. These
results demonstrate that
shifts in the supply of
natural DOM were
followed by changes in
both bacterial
production and community
composition, suggesting
that changes in function
are likely predicated on
at least an initial
change in the community
composition. In similar
experiments we also
examined how
photo-oxidation of DOM
affected microbial
activity and DOM
processing along these
dominant hydrological
flow paths. The
impacts of DOM
photo-oxidation depended
in part on DOM source,
but also due to the
relatively rapid shifts
in bacterial community
composition to groups
better able to consume
photo-products or
tolerate harmful
radicals (Judd et al.
2007). Overall, these
results indicate that
variation in DOM
composition of soil and
surface waters
influences bacterial
community dynamics, and
in turn different
communities control
rates of carbon
processing in set
patterns across the
landscape.
These landscape-level
interactions were also
observed between
different aquatic
ecosystems. In
earlier work of the
LTER,
we showed that in a
connected series of
lakes and streams there
was consistent and
directional (downslope)
processing of materials
that produced spatial
patterns in many
limnological variables,
and these patterns were
coherent over time
(Kling et al. 2000).
That is, the
interactions of material
processing in both lakes
and rivers are critical
for understanding the
structure and function
of surface waters,
especially in a
landscape perspective.
In recent research we
have expanded these
ideas to show that the
processing of DOM by
microbes, and the
species of microbes
present, vary
consistently as water
moves through a network
of streams and lakes in
the Toolik catchment.
For example, in Toolik
Lake itself the rate of
bacterial activity was
related to shifts in the
source (terrestrial
versus phytoplankton)
and lability of DOM, and
that bacterioplankton
communities were
composed of persistent
populations present
throughout the year and
transient populations
that appeared and
disappeared (Figure
LW-6; Crump et al.
2003). Shifts in
community composition,
measured by denaturing
gradient gel
electrophoresis (DGGE)
of 16S rRNA genes, were
associated with an
annual peak in bacterial
productivity driven by
the large influx of
labile terrestrial DOM
associated with spring
runoff. A second shift
occurred after the
terrestrial DOM flux
declined and as the
summer phytoplankton
community developed.
Bacterioplankton
community composition
was also compared across
10 lakes and 14 streams
within the Toolik
catchment. Both lake
and stream systems
shared bacteria species
(OTUs from DGGE
analysis), and stream
communities changed with
distance from the
upstream lake,
suggesting both
dispersal of species
between lakes and
streams as well as
inoculation and dilution
with bacteria from soil
waters or hyporheic
zones (Crump et al.
2007). At the same
time, similarity in lake
and stream communities
shifted gradually down
the catchment (Figure
LW-7). We found evidence
that dispersal
influences
bacterioplankton
communities via
advection and dilution
(mass effects) in
streams, and via
inoculation and
subsequent growth in
lakes, and that the
spatial pattern of
bacterioplankton
community composition
was strongly influenced
by interactions among
soil water, stream, and
lake environments.
Overall these results
reveal large differences
in lake-specific and
stream-specific
bacterial community
composition over
restricted spatial
scales (< 10 km), and
suggest that geographic
distance and
connectivity influence
the distribution of
bacterioplankton
communities across a
landscape.
(3) Controls on
biogeochemical processes
and catchment export.
One of the most
critical issues in
ecosystem research today
is understanding how,
exactly, do we apply our
mechanistic or
process-based knowledge
of ecosystem function
generated at small
scales such as a m2
plot, to larger
scales such as an entire
catchment, region, or
biome. There are
myriad concerns and
approaches related to
issues of “ecological
scaling”, but in our
LTER we have focused on
hillslopes as the
“missing scale” required
to transfer detailed
process information to
larger and larger areas
(Figure LW-8). 
The
toposequence of a
hillslope represents the
major ecosystem types
and landscape morphology
of an entire catchment,
yet can be studied in
depth and cohesively
(e.g., Giblin et al.
1991). For
example, we can monitor
soil water chemistry
from the hilltop to
valley bottom through
time, and relate the
observed patterns to
soil, plant, and
microbial processes.
The pattern of DOC
concentration in soil
waters on the hillslope
in 2005 (Figure LW-9)
shows early and late
summer peaks at
mid-slope, slightly
elevated concentrations
at the footslope near
the valley floor
throughout the summer,
and no evidence of major
transport of DOC from
upslope to downslope
during the summer.
Our interpretation of
this pattern is that
most DOC production and
consumption occurs in
situ, which is
consistent with the idea
presented earlier that
large amounts of DOC
processing occur before
DOC leaves the
catchment.
Preliminary data suggest
that the same patterns
(and interpretation)
occur for other
dissolved materials such
as nitrogen and
phosphorus, and the next
step is to examine the
specific processes and
rates at the landscape
points where
concentrations are high
or they change rapidly.

Although the mass of C
or nutrients processed
on the hillslope may be
much greater than that
transported downslope
and into streams and
lakes, the materials
transported have both
great impacts on the
functioning of receiving
surface waters, and can
be substantial relative
to the net C storage on
land. Modeling of
these landscape
interactions based on a
spatially linked,
transect model indicates
that hillslope
interactions such as the
downslope movement of
nutrients and water may
account for a 30%
increase in C
sequestration in tundra
ecosystems over the next
century (Figure LW-10;
Rastetter et al. 2004).

Through monitoring and
experimental
manipulation, we are
collecting the data
needed to better model
these interactions.
And through this
research we are
developing the
methodology to link
plot-scale
biogeochemical models
with realistic
hydrological models, in
order to better simulate
hillslope processes.
In the future, we hope
to scale this hill-slope
model so it can be
driven with coarse-scale
spatial data to project
our knowledge of
hill-slope processes to
the Pan Arctic and over
the next century and
beyond.
(4) Permafrost
melting and
biogeochemical impacts
on terrestrial and
aquatic ecosystems.
Despite clear evidence
of arctic warming, from
the loss of sea ice to
shifts in vegetation and
species ranges, many
measurements throughout
the Arctic, including at
Toolik Lake, show a
surprising lack of
permafrost melting in
the soil (Figure
LW-11). At the
same time, we have
measured substantial
increases in the
alkalinity of Toolik
Lake since 1975, and
these changes are
unrelated to processes
in the lake and appear
instead to be caused by increased
weathering of mineral
soils in the catchment (Figure
LW-11). This
is puzzling given the
fact that the depth of
summer thaw has not
increased over time to
expose more mineral
soil. However,
these measurements of
the maximum depth of
summer thaw in soils are
traditionally made using
steel probes, which are
limited in their use to
upland terrestrial
environments. To
overcome this limitation
we used a new approach
to show that changes in
the geochemistry of
surface waters must be
related to changes in
thaw depth, although the
thawing may be confined
to the unfrozen zones
underneath streams and
lakes rather than to the
entire upland catchment.
The
first piece of evidence
we have to build this
conclusion is that the
carbonate concentrations
in the soils increase
with depth because the
deeper soils are more
mineral rich, and they
have been frozen so that
less weathering has
occurred (Keller et al.
2007). The second
piece of evidence is
that the ratio of
strontium isotopes (87Sr/86Sr)
in soils decreases with
depth near the Arctic
LTER (Figure LW-12).
This means that as
rainwater flows through
deeper and deeper soils
it will pick-up the soil
signature and the
strontium isotopic ratio
in the water will
decrease. Finally,
we observed just such a
decrease in strontium
isotope ratio in the
stream entering Toolik
Lake over the last 10
years (Figure LW-12).
The implication is that
water flowpaths in the
basin have progressively
deepened and are now in
contact with previously
frozen soils of
different chemistry.
Because thaw depths of
terrestrial sites have
not changed during that
time period, it is
likely that the unfrozen
thaw bulb found
underneath streams and
lakes has actually
expanded, and the deeper
thaw here contributes
most to the altered
chemistry. Our
results also suggest
that increasing thaw
depth will lead to
increasing Ca supply to
soils and streams, as
well as spatially
variable increases in P
and K supply (Keller et
al. 2007). It may
be that such changes in
stream chemistry caused
by permafrost melting
are more widespread in
the Arctic than
currently believed,
which can be tested
using this new
geochemical method at
other sites in arctic
and boreal regions with
permafrost.
REFERENCES
Cole, J. J., N. Caraco,
N., G. W. Kling, and T.
Kratz. 1994.
Carbon dioxide
supersaturation in the
surface waters of lakes.
Science 265:1568-1570.
Crump, B. C., G. W.
Kling, M. Bahr, J. E.
Hobbie. 2003.
Bacterioplankton
community shifts in an
arctic lake correlate
with seasonal changes in
organic matter source.
Applied Environmental
Microbiology
69:2253-2268.
Crump,
B. C., H. E. Adams, J. E. Hobbie, G. W. Kling.
In Press.
Biogeography of
bacterioplankton in
lakes and streams of an
Arctic tundra catchment.
Ecology 88: .
Giblin, A.E., K.J.
Nadelhoffer, G.R.
Shaver, J.A. Laundre and
A.J. McKerrow.
1991.
Biogeochemical diversity
along a riverside
toposequence in arctic
Alaska. Ecol.
Monogr. 61:415-435.
Judd, K. E. and G. W.
Kling. 2002.
Production and export of
dissolved C in arctic
tundra mesocosms: the
roles of vegetation and
water flow.
Biogeochemistry
60:213-234.
Judd, K.E., B.C. Crump,
and G. W. Kling.
2006.
Environmental drivers
control ecosystem
function in bacteria
through changes in
community composition.
Ecology 87:2068-2079.
Judd, K. E., B. C. Crump, and G. W. Kling. 2007. Bacterial
responses in activity
and community
composition to
photo-oxidation of
dissolved organic matter
from soil and surface
waters. Aquatic
Sciences 69:96-107.
DOI
10.1007/s00027-006-0908-4.
Keller, K., J. Blum, and
G. W. Kling. 2007.
Geochemistry of soils
and streams on surfaces
of varying ages in
arctic Alaska.
Arctic, Antarctic, &
Alpine Research
39:84-98.
Kling, G. W. 1995.
Land-water linkages: the
influence of terrestrial
diversity on aquatic
systems, pp. 297-310.
In: F. S. Chapin and C.
Korner (eds.), The Role
of Biodiversity in
Arctic and Alpine Tundra
Ecosystems,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
320pp.
Kling, G. W., G. W.
Kipphut, and M. C.
Miller. 1991.
Arctic lakes and rivers
as gas conduits to the
atmosphere: implications
for tundra carbon
budgets. Science
251:298-301.
Kling, G. W., G. W.
Kipphut, and M. C.
Miller. 1992.
The flux of carbon
dioxide and methane from
lakes and rivers in
arctic Alaska.
Hydrobiologia 240:23-36.
Kling, G. W., G. W.
Kipphut, M. C. Miller,
and W. J. O'Brien.
2000. Integration
of lakes and streams in
a landscape perspective:
the importance of
material processing on
spatial patterns and
temporal coherence.
Freshwater Biology
43:477-497.
Rastetter, E.B., B. L. Kwiatkowski, S. Le Dízes, and J.E. Hobbie.
2004. The Role of
Down-Slope Water and
Nutrient Fluxes in the
Response of Arctic Hill
Slopes to Climate
Change.
Biogeochemistry
69:37-62.
Reeburgh, W.S., J.Y.
King, S.K. Regli, G.W.
Kling, N.A. Auerbach,
D.A. Walker. 1998.
A CH4
emission estimate for
the Kuparuk River Basin,
Alaska. J.
Geophysical Research
103:29,005-2,9013.
Zak, D. R. and G. W.
Kling. 2006.
Microbial Community
Composition and Function
across an Arctic Tundra
Landscape. Ecology
87:1659-1670.
|