LTER network Toolik Field Station MBLhome page

Weather at Toolik

Toolik Weather Graphs

Arctic LTER Weather Stations

Toolik Webcam

Animated Gif of yesterday's Webcam

Arctic LTER Inhouse login

Arctic LTER Database

Arctic LTER Database

Conditions of Use

The re-use of scientific data has the potential to greatly increase communication, collaboration and synthesis within and among disciplines, and thus is fostered, supported and encouraged. Permission to use this dataset is granted to the Data User free of charge subject to the following terms:

1) Acceptable use. Use of the dataset will be restricted to academic, research, educational, government, recreational, or other not-for-profit professional purposes. The Data User is permitted to produce and distribute derived works from this dataset provided that they are released under the same license terms as those accompanying this Data Set. Any other uses for the Data Set or its derived products will require explicit permission from the dataset owner.
2 ) Redistribution. The data are provided for use by the Data User. The metadata and this license must accompany all copies made and be available to all users of this Data Set. The Data User will not redistribute the original Data Set beyond this collaboration sphere.
3 ) Citation. It is considered a matter of professional ethics to acknowledge the work of other scientists. Thus, the Data User will properly cite the Data Set in any publications or in the metadata of any derived data products that were produced using the Data Set. Citation should take the following general form: Creator, Year of Data Publication, Title of Dataset, Publisher, Dataset identifier. For example:

Shaver, G. 1989. Above ground biomass in acidic tussock tundra experimental site, 1989, Arctic LTER, Toolik, Alaska. Arctic LTER, Marine Biological Lab, Woods Hole, Ma 02543. 1989gsttbm http://ecosystems.mbl.edu/arc/terrest/biomass/index.shtml 

4 ) Acknowledgement. The Data User should acknowledge any institutional support or specific funding awards referenced in the metadata accompanying this dataset in any publications where the Data Set contributed significantly to its content. Acknowledgements should identify the supporting party, the party that received the support, and any identifying information such as grant numbers. For example:

Data sets were provided by the Arctic LTER. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants #DEB-981022, 9211775, 8702328; #OPP-9911278, 9911681, 9732281, 9615411, 9615563, 9615942, 9615949, 9400722, 9415411, 9318529; #BSR 9019055, 8806635, 8507493.

5 ) Notification. The Data User will notify the Data Set Contact when any derivative work or publication based on or derived from the Data Set is distributed. The Data User will provide the data contact with two reprints of any publications resulting from use of the Data Set and will provide copies, or on-line access to, any derived digital products. Notification will include an explanation of how the Data Set was used to produce the derived work.
6 ) Collaboration. The Data Set has been released in the spirit of open scientific collaboration. Data Users are thus strongly encouraged to consider consultation, collaboration and/or co-authorship with the Data Set Creator.

By accepting this Data Set, the Data User agrees to abide by the terms of this agreement. The Data Owner shall have the right to terminate this agreement immediately by written notice upon the Data User's breach of, or non-compliance with, any of its terms. The Data User may be held responsible for any misuse that is caused or encouraged by the Data User's failure to abide by the terms of this agreement.

Disclaimer

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.

Dataset URLs:METADATA: HTML, Rich Text, XML(EML compliant)
DATA: Comma Delimited, Excel file with Metadata and data
Dataset ID:2012_GS_ITEX_PF_LAISummary.04
Dataset Title:Summary of three different Leaf Area Index (LAI) methodologies of 19 1m x 1m point frame plots sampled near the LTER Shrub plots at Toolik Field Station in AK the summer of 2012.
Investigator 1: 
First Name:Gaius
Last Name:Shaver
Organization:Ecosystems Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory
Address line 2:7 MBL Street
Address line 3:
City:Woods Hole
State:MA
Zip Code:02543
Country:United States
Investigator 2: 
First Name:Edward
Last Name:Rastetter
Organization:Ecosystems Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory
Address line 2:7 MBL Street
City:Woods Hole
State:MA
Zip Code:02543
Country:United States
Investigator 3: 
First Name:Mathew
Last Name:Williams
Organization:University of Edinburgh
Address line 2:School of Geosciences
City:Edinburgh
State:
Zip Code:EH9 EJU
Country:United Kingdom
Investigator 4: 
First Name:James
Last Name:Laundre
Organization:Ecosystems Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory
Address line 2:7 MBL Street
Address line 3:
City:Woods Hole
Zip Code:02543
Country:United States
Investigator 5: 
First Name:Laura
Last Name:van der Pol
Organization:Ecosystems Center at the Marine Biological Laboratory
Address line 2:7 MBL Street
City:Woods Hole
State:MA
Zip Code:02543
Country:United States
Associate Investigators:
Keywords:photosynthesis; shrub canopy; point frame; Delta-T SunScan; leaf area index (LAI); reflectance; NDVI
Abstract:Summary of three methods used to estimate the Leaf Area Index (LAI) of 19 1m x 1m plots sampled with a point frame near the LTER Shrub plots at the Toolik Field Station in AK the summer of 2012. The methods used were: (1) exponential relationship between LAI and NDVI as measured above the canopy with a Unispec spetroradiometer; (2) Delta-T SunScan canopy analyzer held at 5 cm above the ground under both direct and diffuse light conditions; (3) pin-drop point frame tequnique. Where values have been averaged (such as for the NDVI and SunScan measurements), the standard deviation is given. Raw data are available upon request for the Unispec data; the raw SunScan data is available under the file "PF_SunScan_LAI".
For questions about the Metadata and data contact the Investigators.
For information about this web site contact:
Arctic LTER Information Manager
The Ecosystems Center
Marine Biological Lab
7 MBL St
Woods Hole, MA 02543
Phone (508) 289 7496
Email: arc_im@mbl.edu
Online URL: http://ecosystems.mbl.edu/ARC/
DATA FILE INFORMATION:
Data File URL http://metacat.lternet.edu/das/dataAccessServlet?docid=knb-lter-arc.10146&urlTail=terrest/tracegas/data/2012_GS_ITEX_PF_LAISummary.csv
Data File Name 2012_GS_ITEX_PF_LAISummary
Beginning Date 6/23/2012
End Date 8/7/2012
Number of Data Records 19
Other Files to Reference MANY OTHERS
Availability Status 1
Quality Control Information
Maintenance Description This was a season-long project, though it followed similar methods to ITEX projects performed starting in 2003 that are likely to be replicated in the future for reasearch at the Toolik Field Station, AK.
Log of Changes: Version 2: Missing values changed to #N/A. CH 28Jan2013
Version 3: Metadata updated to newer form (with sites sheet). CH April 2013.
Version 4: Corrected eml excel file name wrong extension. JimL 16May13
 
RESEARCH LOCATION:                  
Location Name LTER Shrub Block 1 LTER Shrub Block 2 Select Site or enter New One Select Site or enter New One Select Site or enter New One Select Site or enter New One Select Site or enter New One Select Site or enter New One  
Geographic Description Upland site; co-located in Block 1 of the Shrub LTER sites; IVO 68° 38'18.8" N, 149° 34' 07.2" W +/- 50m. Except for plots marked "FERT", plots are outside of the designated LTER treatments, though are exposed to the same environmental conditions. All plots were chosen by the dominant shrub canopy (either Salix pulchraor Betula nana) and preferentially selected to be 90cm+ in height. Outlet site; co-located in Block 2 of the Shrub LTER sites; IVO 68° 38'008.1" N, 149° 35' 017.1" W +/- 50m. Except for plots marked "FERT", plots are outside of the designated LTER treatments, though are exposed to the same environmental conditions. All plots were chosen by the dominant shrub canopy (either Salix pulchraor Betula nana) and preferentially selected to be 90cm+ in height. Enter Description Enter Description Enter Description Enter Description Enter Description Enter Description  
Location Bounding Box                  
West Bounding Coordinate                  
East Bounding Coordinate                  
North Bounding Coordinate                  
South Bounding Coordinate                  
OR if single point location                  
Latitude 68.6385555555555 68.6355833333333 In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees  
Longitude -149.568666666666 -149.588083333333 In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees In Decimal Degrees  
Elevation 747 m 730 m In Meters In Meters In Meters In Meters In Meters In Meters  
Link to Google Map View on Google Map View on Google Map              
                   
 
TAXONOMIC COVERAGE:
Organisms studied Betula nana; Salix pulchra; Salix glauca
 
Methods:MAXIMUM CANOPY HEIGHT
We measured the maximum canopy height of each chamber flux and point frame plot by measuring the five highest branches in the shrub canopy. Each height is measured from the soil, defined as the end of the green plant tissue, to the heighest point on each branch. The maximum height was always measured from different individual plants, thus only one branch from any particular plant was sampled even if there might be multiple "highest" branches from a single plant. See the file "MaxCanopyHeight" for more detailed information.

POINT FRAME PIN-DROP METHOD:
We preferentially selected tall shrub canopies dominated either by Betula nana or Salix pulchra, that is canopies that were greater than 75 cm height. Care was taken to select fairly uniform canopies, that is avoiding the edge of a shrub stand or areas where the canopy had a large gaps, suggesting the area may have been disturbed.

We used point frames constructed from a 1.1 m x 1.1 m aluminum square with holes in each corner to accomodate steel rod posts used as the legs of the point frame. In this way, the frame could rest upon the four leg posts that had been hammered into the ground and remain adjustable in each corner. The frame had a level on each side, and great care was taken to ensure that the frame was (a) unable to be pushed deeper into the ground and, (b) level on all four sides prior to taking measurements. These factors were important to the measurement to have accurate data regarding the distance from the frame and the overall height of each point sampled in the canopy.

The aluminum frame had numbered, regularly spaced holes on two opposite sides in order to accomodate a metal bar that could be placed across the frame and locked into place. [These holes on the frame are the row numbers.] The bar that was placed across the frame similarly had numbered, evenly spaced holes in order to accomodate a pin--a long (100-200cm) metal rod with a diameter of ~3.175 mm. [The holes on this bar are the pin hole numbers.] Measurements were only ever taken from odd row numbers, and alternated even/odd pin hole numbers with each row; in this way, for every plot 25 evenly spaced locations were sampled covering an area of one square meter.

The length of the pin was marked every half-centimeter so that the distance could be read easily. Measurements were made by lowering the pin through a pin hole and, once encountering a leaf or stem, recording the following: row#, pin hole#, hit#, and the species hit. If the object hit was not a leaf, the plant tissue was noted; the diameter of each stem hit was estimated in millimeters, and the length of every graminoid blade hit was recorded from the point at which it was hit to the tip. As the primary species of interest for this project were for a select number of species (B. nana, S. pulchra, S. glauca, S. reticulata, V. uliginosum, V. vitis, L. palustre), species that were not the target of interest were classified as functional groups--e.g. graminoid spp., forb, moss. The last pin-hit recorded for each pin hole was always at the "soil" which was considered to be the transition between the green and brown plant material, often in a mossy layer.

In order to calculate the overall LAI as well as the LAI contrubution from each species, the total number of hits for each species was multiplied by 0.04 m2 (the data was calculated both with and without stem-hits).

NDVI and LAI FROM UNISPEC MEASUREMENT:
We measured NDVI on each point frame using a single channel Unipec spectral analysis system (PP Systems Inc, Amesbury, MA, USA). The unispec spectral analyser measures reflected light intensity in 256 portions of the visible spectrum from ~300nm to ~1100nm. A foreoptic cable transmits light reflected from the target to the instrument, a measurement scan lasts for ~15-80ms. Nine scans were measured in a regular grid for each of the point frame plots. The end of the fibre optic was kept approximately 30cm vertically above the top of the canopy. The NDVI values were calculated using the equation below and then the NDVI values averaged together for each of the nine scans. Each scan was corrected for both incident radiation as well as sensor error. The incident radiation was accounted for with a "reference scan" taken by holding the foreoptic cable vertically above a white, reference standard under the same light conditions as subsequent measurements. The scans were also corrected for with a "dark scan" taken with the sensor exposed to complete darkness (covering the sensor input with a black cloth) to account for the intrinsic error in the sensor itself. The program Multispec5.1.5.exe was used to compile and integrate the Unispec reflectance spectra from the raw target spectra.

NDVI quantifies “greenness” and is strongly related to leaf area (Van Wijk and Williams 2005). We measured the NDVI using a single-channel Unispec spectral analyzer (PP systems) and used the equation derived by Street et al (2007) to calculate LAI as dexcribed below.

DELTA-T SUNSCAN LAI METHOD
The data included in this document are only from measurements taken at ground level (~5cm), thus those measurements representing the LAI of the entire canopy. These methods, however, describe all LAI measurements taken with the DeltaT SunScan wand; the complete dataset is available under the title "2012_GS_ITEX_SunScan_LAI".

We measured the LAI using a DeltaT SunScan wand in conjuction with the BF3 sensor (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Burwell Cambridge, UK). The SunScan wand compares indident light readings measured on the BF3 sensor with the 64-PAR readings on the light wand to calculate LAI along the length of the 1m-long wand. LAI was measured by inserting the SunScan wand as near to the ground as possible--typically ~5cm from the ground as the wand rested on top of moss--and then measured vertically every 15 cm with the last measurement being above the canopy. Measurements were taken from the side of the chamber or point frame opposite the sun at three locations under both direct (ambient) and diffuse light conditions . In many cases the replicates at each height were differentiated by row (1-3, or occasionaly 3-8 which correspond to the point frame pins). Typically diffuse light conditions were achieved by shading both the BF3 sensor and the shrub canopy with photographic diffuser panels. On occasion, measurements were taken during cloudy light conditions where the diffuse light fraction was greater than 0.7 and no diffuser panel was needed; on these occasions the direct and diffuse light estimates may have been taken in slightly different locations as they were taken at different times and the precise position of the SunScan wand could not be replicated exactly.

The SunScan wand measures PAR along 64 points along a 1-m horizontal profile. When sampling PAR within the shrub canopy, the data are from the raw output from each PAR sensor. When sampling LAI, there is an internal calculation performed though the Delta-T software that compares the reading above the canopy to the reading within the canopy, and takes into account the percent of absorbed PAR (assumed to be 0.85), and the ellipsoidal leaf angle distribution parameter (ELADP*) (assumed to be 1.0).

In addition to the LAI values, the Delta-T SunScan instrument gives an output of other variables including: transmitted light, spread among sensors, beam fraction, and zenith angle. These values are further described here:

Transmitted Light: the fraction of incident light that passes through a given canopy. It can refer to Direct, Diffuse, or Total incident light.

Spread: the standard deviation of the 64-PAR sensors on the SunScan wand.

Beam Fraction: the fraction of the Total incident PAR in the Direct beam.

Zenith Angle: the angle between the centre of the sun and the point directly overhead.
Zenith angles are calculated from latitude, longitude, and local time using standard astronomical equations as given in Practical Astronomy. The location used to determine the local zenith angle was: 68° 37' 39" N, Longitude 149° 35' 51" W.

*"ELADP is a way of characterizing the horizontal or vertical tendency of leaves in a canopy." p 37 of SS1 User Manual v2.0 (SunScan Canopy Analysis System, type SS1. Delta-T Devices Ltd. May 19, 2008)

CALCULATIONS:
NDVI = (RII-RI)
(RI + RII)

where RI = average reflectance from 570nm to 680nm
RII = average reflectance from 725nm to 1000nm.

LAI = 0.0026 * e^(8.0783 * NDVI) - From (Street et al. 2007)

Pin-drop LAI:
LAI = (Total number of pin-hits) * [(average number of hits per location) / (number of locations sampled)]
LAI = (Total # hits) * (1/25)


REFERENCES:
Street L. E. Shaver G. R. Williams M. and van Wijk M. T. 2007. What is the relationship between changes in canopy leaf area and changes in photosynthetic CO2 flux in arctic ecosystems? Journal of Ecology 95: 139-150.

van Wijk M. T. Williams M. and. Shaver G. R. 2005. Tight coupling between leaf area index and foliage N content in arctic plant communities. Oecologia 142: 421–427.

Data Table

Variable Name Variable Description Data Type Units DateTime Format Code Information Missing Value Code
YEAR year of measurement datetime   YYYY    
DATE date of measurement datetime   DD-MMM-YY    
SITE Toolik text        
GROUP Measurement location in relation to Toolik Lake LTER Shrub plots; In vicinity of Block1 = Upland, IVO Block 2 = Outlet text        
PLOT Individual plot identifier text        
TREATMENT control or fertilized annually (with N and P) text        
PLOT SIZE 1m x 1m point frame size text        
DOMINANT VEGETATION Dominant canopy vegetation text        
MAX CANOPY HT Average height from soil of the five tallest shoots in the plot sampled number centimeter      
AVG NDVI Average of nine normalized difference of vegetation index (NDVI) values - calculations below number dimensionless      
STDEV NDVI Standard deviation of the NDVI measurements (n = 9) number dimensionless      
AVG LAI FROM NDVI LAI calculated from NDVI values (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
STDEV LAI FROM NDVI Standard deviation of the LAI-from-NDVI values (n=9) (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
SUNSCAN DIRECT LAI (5CM) Average SunScan LAI measurement taken under direct light conditions (n=3) (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared     #N/A=Missing or Not Measured
SUNSCAN DIRECT STDEV LAI (5CM) Standard deviation of SunScan LAI measurement taken under direct light (n=3) (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared     #N/A=Missing or Not Measured
SUNSCAN DIFFUSE LAI (5CM) Average SunScan LAI measurement taken under diffuse light conditions (n=3) (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
SUNSCAN DIFFUSE STDEV LAI (5 CM) Standard deviation of SunScan LAI measurement taken under direct light (n=3) (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
TOTAL # PIN-HITS Total number of leaves and stems hit by the point frame pin for a given plot number number      
NO STEM - PIN-DROP LAI TOTAL Overall LAI measured by pin-drop method not including hits that were stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI Betula nana LAI from B. nana leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI S.glauca LAI from B. nana leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI S. pulchra LAI from S. pulchra leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI S. reticula LAI from S. reticulata leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI V. uliginosum LAI from V. uliginosum leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI Forb spp. LAI from forb species' leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI Gramminoid spp. LAI from graminoid species' leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI Ledum palustre LAI from L. palustre leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI V. vitis LAI from V. vitis leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
NO STEM - PinDrop LAI P. fruiticosa LAI from P. fruiticosa leaves (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PIN-DROP LAI TOTAL Overall LAI measured by pin-drop method including hits that were stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI Betula nana LAI from B. nana leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI S.glauca LAI from B. nana leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI S. pulchra LAI from S. pulchra leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI S. reticula LAI from S. reticulata leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI V. uliginosum LAI from V. uliginosum leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI Forb spp. LAI from forb species' leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI Gramminoid spp. LAI from graminoid species' leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI Ledum palustre LAI from L. palustre leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI V. vitis LAI from V. vitis leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
WITH STEM - PinDrop LAI P. fruiticosa LAI from P. fruiticosa leaves and stems (square m leaf per square m ground) number meterSquaredPerMeterSquared      
COMMENTS Notes or data quality information text        
Please contact arc_im@mbl.edu with questions, comments, or for technical assistance regarding this web site.