|



Toolik Weather Graphs
Arctic LTER Weather Stations
Toolik Webcam
Animated Gif of yesterday's Webcam
Arctic LTER Inhouse login
|
Arctic LTER Database
Arctic LTER Database
Acceptance and utilization of LTER data requires that:
(1) The Principal Investigator be sent a notice stating reasons for acquiring any data and a description of the publication intentions.
(2) The Principal Investigator of the data set be sent a copy of the report or manuscript prior to submission and be adequately cited in any resultant publications.
(3) A copy of any resultant publications should be sent to:
Principal Investigator
Ecosystems Center
Marine Biological Laboratory
7 MBL St.
Woods Hole, MA 02543
Older Metadata: Attribute table not in XML (EML) file
| Dataset URLs: | METADATA: HTML, Rich Text, XML(EML compliant) DATA: Comma Delimited, Excel file with Metadata and data |
| Dataset ID: | 96boht04 |
| Dataset Title: | TRhodamine WT (RWT) concentrations with in the hyporheic and parafluvial zones of lower Kuparuk River as a result of a continuos addition of the conservative tracer, RWT, to the channel at an upstream site, Arctic LTER 1996. |
| Investigator 1: |   |
| First Name: | William | | Last Name: | Bowden | | Address line 1: | | | Address line 2: | | | Address line 3: | | | City: | | | State: | | | Zip Code: | | | Country: | | | Associate Investigators: | Kenneth Edwardson |
| Keywords: | Kuparuk, hyporheic, Rhodamine WT, tracer, temperature, phosphate, nitrate, ammonium, dissolved oxygen, specific, conductivity, methane, and carbon dioxide |
| Abstract: |
TRhodamine WT (RWT) concentrations with in the
hyporheic and parafluvial zones of lower Kuparuk River as a
result of a continuos addition of the conservative tracer, RWT,
to the channel at an upstream site. Additionally, the
concentration of one or more of the following, associated with a
given hyporheic at some time during the addition, exists within
the file; phosphate, nitrate, ammonium, dissolved oxygen,
specific conductivity, methane, and carbon dioxide. |
| Contact: |
Arctic LTER Information Manager
The Ecosystems Center
Marine Biological Lab
7 MBL St
Woods Hole, MA 02543
Phone (508) 289 7496
Email: arc_im@mbl.edu
Online URL: http://ecosystems.mbl.edu/ARC/ |
| DATA FILE INFORMATION: |
|
| Data File Name |
96boht04 |
| Beginning Date |
5/1/1996 |
| End Date |
9/1/1996 |
| Number of Data Records |
|
| Other Files to Reference |
|
| Availability Status |
|
| Quality Control Information |
|
| Maintenance Description |
|
| Log of Changes: |
Log of changes:
For Archival Use:
DATA RECEIVED: June 1997
DATA FILE ENTERED BY: Karie Slavik
DATA FILE VALIDATION:
NAME:
DATA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RESEARCH LOCATION: |
|
| Geographic Description |
Near the mouth of the Kuparuk river in
Prudhoe bay area (+1800meters) in conjunction with the 1996 15N
addition. |
| Location Bounding Box |
|
| West Bounding Coordinate |
|
| East Bounding Coordinate |
|
| North Bounding Coordinate |
|
| South Bounding Coordinate |
|
| OR if single point location |
|
| Latitude |
|
| Longitude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TAXONOMIC COVERAGE: |
|
| Organisms studied |
|
|
|
| Methods: |
Samplers were installed longitudinally down a riffle and down- gradient along the left and right pointbars of the instrumented riffle. Well Construction/Installation: Hyporheic samplers consisted of a 1/8 inch O.D. stainless steel (S.S.) tube housed in a 3/4 inch CPVC pipe. At the lower end of the CPVC a rubber stopper was inserted with the S.S tube protruding ten centimeters. A coupler was then used to attach a length of well screen to protect the S.S. tube. Tygon tubing was slid onto the top end of the S.S tubing and a three-way Pharmaseal stopcock was inserted into the tubing. Samplers were inserted into the stream bed by forcing a pry bar into the stream bed to a depth of the maximum depth allowed, typically 30-60 centimeters. The sampler was then worked down into the hole and the pry bar removed, allowing the hole to cave in onto the sampler. The length of the sampler, still above the substrate, was measured and subtracted from the total length to find the depth of the sampler in the substrate. Samplers were allowed to settle before any testing occurred. Sample collection: Samples were collected via a 60 mL syringe directly from the sampler after drawing 30 mL out to purge the interior of the sampler. Samples were places directly into a 13 mm diameter borsilicate glass vial with a Teflon lined cap that could be placed directly into the fluorometer. Samples collected for ammonium, nitrate and phosphate were immediatly filtered through a 0.45 um cellulose acetate filter and stored cold until analysis. Sample analysis: Specific conductivity was measured in the field on a VWR model 2052 conductivity meter. All sample analysis was done within 24 hours of collection and stored cold during the interim period. Ammonia-nitrogen concentrations were determined by the phenate method. Nitrate-nitrogen was determined by cadmium reduction. Phosphate-phosphorous was determined by the ascorbic acid method. Samples were analyzed for their RWT concentration on a Turner Designs model AU-10 fluorometer. Carbon dioxide and methane were measured directly by equilibration of the sample with ambient air. The head-space air was then analyzed by thermal conductivity for CO2 and flame ionization for CH4. Concentrations were corrected for ambient concentrations, depth, temperature, and pH. Notes: The variable, D/D for River distance is in reference to the top of the riffle and the distances established by the 1996, 15N addition. Use the X and Y coordinates (river right to left and distance downstream) for more detailed positions. (12) VARIABLE DESCRIPTIONS:
Precision Coded? Missing Variable Variable Description Units (Y/N) Values Site
River
n n D/D
River distance
meters n n
Series Sampler Location
n y Number Sampler number
n y X
X-coordinate
meters n y Y
Y-coordinate
meters n y Time Time
hhmm
n y Date
Date
dd-mmm-yy n n RWT
Rhodamine WT concentration ug/L
n y CO2
Carbon Dioxide
umoles/L n y CH4
Methane
umoles/L n y Depth Depth of Sampler
cm
n y SPC
Conductivity
mmhos n y NH4
Ammonia
umoles/L n y PO4
Phosphate
umoles/L n y NO3
Nitrate
umoles/L n y Temp
Temperature
Celsius n y Comments Reference Citations: American Public Health Association. 1989. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC. Kling,G.W., Kipphut, G.W., and Miller, M.C. 1992. The Flux of CO2 and CH4 from lakes and rivers in arctic Alaska. Hydrobiologia, 240:23-36.
Sampling Description.
None |
Data Table
Site River n n
D/D River distance meters n n
Series Sampler Location n y
Number Sampler number n y
X X-coordinate meters n y
Y Y-coordinate meters n y
Time Time hhmm n y
Date Date dd-mmm-yy n n
RWT Rhodamine WT concentration ug/L n y
CO2 Carbon Dioxide umoles/L n y
CH4 Methane umoles/L n y
Depth Depth of Sampler cm n y
SPC Conductivity mmhos n y
NH4 Ammonia umoles/L n y
PO4 Phosphate umoles/L n y
NO3 Nitrate umoles/L n y
Temp Temperature Celsius n y
Comments
|
|