|

Toolik Weather Graphs
Arctic LTER Weather Stations
Toolik Webcam
Animated Gif of yesterday's Webcam
Arctic LTER Inhouse login
|
Arctic LTER Database
Arctic LTER Database
Acceptance and utilization of LTER data requires that:
(1) The Principal Investigator be sent a notice stating reasons for acquiring any data and a description of the publication intentions.
(2) The Principal Investigator of the data set be sent a copy of the report or manuscript prior to submission and be adequately cited in any resultant publications.
(3) A copy of any resultant publications should be sent to:
Principal Investigator
Ecosystems Center
Marine Biological Laboratory
7 MBL St.
Woods Hole, MA 02543
Older Metadata: Attribute table not in XML (EML) file
| Dataset URLs: | METADATA: HTML, Rich Text, XML(EML compliant) DATA: Comma Delimited, Excel file with Metadata and data |
| Dataset ID: | 92bomopt |
| Dataset Title: | Point transects used to estimate epilithic bryophyte and macroalgal cover of the Kuparuk River, Arctic LTER 1992. |
| Investigator 1: |   |
| First Name: | William | | Last Name: | Bowden | | Address line 1: | | | Address line 2: | | | Address line 3: | | | City: | | | State: | | | Zip Code: | | | Country: | | | Associate Investigators: | Jacques Finlay |
| Keywords: | fertilized, Kuparuk River, control, bryophytes, riffle, epilithic phosphorus, Hygrohypnum, Fontinalis, Schistidium |
| Abstract: |
Point transects used
to estimate epilithic bryophyte and macroalgal cover of the Kuparuk River.
Hygrohypnum, Fontinalis, and Schistidium were the dominant bryophytes
encountered. Transects were done July (early) and July and August (late) in
both fertilized (phosphorus-enriched) and control riffles of the Kuparuk. |
| Contact: |
Arctic LTER Information Manager
The Ecosystems Center
Marine Biological Lab
7 MBL St
Woods Hole, MA 02543
Phone (508) 289 7496
Email: arc_im@mbl.edu
Online URL: http://ecosystems.mbl.edu/ARC/ |
| DATA FILE INFORMATION: |
|
| Data File Name |
92bomopt |
| Beginning Date |
5/1/1992 |
| End Date |
9/1/1992 |
| Number of Data Records |
|
| Other Files to Reference |
|
| Availability Status |
|
| Quality Control Information |
|
| Maintenance Description |
|
| Log of Changes: |
Log of changes:
For Archival Use:
DATE RECEIVED: June 1997
DATA FILE ENTERED BY: Karie Slavik
DATA FILE VALIDATION:
NAME: Karie Slavik
DATE: 03Sept97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| RESEARCH LOCATION: |
|
| Geographic Description |
Kuparuk River:
Control: riffles from 0.45 to -1.0 km
Fertilized: riffles from 1.0 to 18.0 km |
| Location Bounding Box |
|
| West Bounding Coordinate |
|
| East Bounding Coordinate |
|
| North Bounding Coordinate |
|
| South Bounding Coordinate |
|
| OR if single point location |
|
| Latitude |
|
| Longitude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| TAXONOMIC COVERAGE: |
|
| Organisms studied |
|
|
|
| Methods: |
In 1990 we observed increased abundance's of several species of aquatic bryophytes in the fertilized zone of the Kuparuk River relative to the control. These bryophytes included, most notably, two species of Hygrohypnum, H. alpestre and H. ochraceum, Fontinalis neomexicana, and, to a lesser extent, Schistidium agassizii and the leafy liverwort Solenostoma. Bryophyte biomass collections from random quadrants in control and phosphorus-enriched zones of the Kuparuk River in 1990 and 1991 indicated that there were 17+/-9 gm dry mass per meter squared in the control zone and 322+/-96 gm in the enriched zone (+/-SE, N = 5). To substantiate these data, we utilized point transects in 1992 to estimate bryophyte coverage in the enriched and control zones. To estimate percent coverage, we normally completed 5 transects per riffle site. In each transect, we proceeded at 10 or 20 cm intervals across the width of the stream. At each interval we noted the presence of any epilithic bryophyte or macroalgae beneath a target point on a clear Plexiglas view-scope. If the point appeared bare we noted "bare". "Bare" rocks had epilithic diatom communities that were too small to see with the unaided eye. In early July, we completed transects in the immediate experimental (1 to 6 km) and control (-1 to 0.45 km) zones. In late July and early August, we completed an extensive survey of the river at and downstream of the fertilized zone (2 to 18 km). During the latter time, a survey from -1 to 20 km of phosphorus concentrations and epilithic algal biomass was completed by Nancy Parmentier. These data are contained in other 1992 LTER files. Notes: Percent cover estimates are expressed as averages of all transects (n=5) at each riffle site for each bryophyte and macroalgal species and for total bryophyte coverage.
Calculations: Variable Formula Reference Citations: Bowden, W. B., J. C. Finlay, and P. E. Maloney. 1994. Long-term effects of PO4 fertilization on the distribution of bryophytes in an arctic river. Freshwater Biology 32:445-454. Finlay, J. C. and W. B. Bowden. 1994. Controls on production of bryophytes in an arctic tundra stream. Freshwater Biology 32:455-466.
Sampling Description.
None |
Data Table
Precise Coded?
Variable Variable description Units (Y/N)
SITE site of measurement y
D/D distance from K or O dripper 0.05 km n
DATE date ddmmyy n
LOCATION location (CONTROL, +P) n
SUBSITE typically POOL or RIFFLE n
TRANS Transect identification n
AVERAGE average percent cover % n
STDEV standard deviation (n=5) n
COMMENTS data specific comments n
|
|